City Oversight

City Council Meetings

Public comments and City Council discussions about AFPD accountability, policies, funding, and services.

Background notes are written for this site and labeled separately from the official meeting minutes. If no council response is listed, we didn’t find one in the minutes reviewed. Meeting minutes may not capture everything discussed.

Meetings are grouped by year.

Additional meeting minutes we reviewed are listed at the bottom. We haven’t found information relevant to police accountability in those minutes.

• 2026

• September 22, 2026 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — September 22, 2026
  • Public Comments

    • Roy Shaw, a resident and retired Air Force Security Police member, raised concerns about recent AFPD conduct. Drawing on the standards of integrity and impartiality from his military service, he urged the chief and mayor to hold officers accountable, impose discipline when warranted, and communicate more openly with the community. View minutes, page 1

    • Daniel Sroka described a productive meeting with Chief Paul about the Ben Schneider incident. He appreciated the chief’s willingness to discuss the matter and said the department was making progress, while noting that more work remained. He expected another meeting in about a week to discuss the chief’s review findings. View minutes, page 2

• September 8, 2026 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — September 8, 2026
  • Public Comments

    • Daniel Sroka said 12 third-party YouTube reviews by lawyers and police officers had identified concerns with the police incident. He said he had attended council meetings for months without seeing change and called for accountability, restored trust, and stronger protection of residents’ constitutional rights. View minutes, page 2

    • Greg Hazard discussed ADA compliance and improvements to the Police Department while also describing positive experiences with American Fork officers. He said he had not requested that Officers Goodale or Kitchen be fired and instead favored training and evaluation. He expressed support for Chief Paul’s leadership and willingness to take ownership, despite their disagreements. View minutes, pages 2–3

    • Heidi Barben asked to email or discuss information about police-officer training programs she had seen. View minutes, page 3

• August 25, 2026 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — August 25, 2026
  • Public Comments

    • Aaron Booker, a nonresident, criticized what he viewed as inconsistent enforcement of meeting decorum and a broader pattern of selective enforcement within the City and Police Department. He urged City officials to apply standards equally, protect First Amendment rights, and pursue meaningful reform. View minutes, page 1

    • Daniel Sroka urged the City to take action to restore public trust in the Police Department, suggesting policy revisions, improved body cameras, or a resident review board. Citing public critiques of body-camera footage, Mr. Sroka called for meaningful reform and emphasized the importance of protecting constitutional rights. View minutes, page 2

    • Debbie Shaw described her family’s longstanding service to American Fork and raised concerns about alleged civil-rights violations involving her son and others. She requested a fair, transparent, and independent review of the Police Department and urged City leadership to restore public trust through accountability and action. View minutes, page 2

    • Jan Chamberlain, a member of the NO ICE in Utah County Coalition, requested a meeting with City officials to discuss immigration enforcement policies. She supported lawful due process while encouraging a humanitarian approach that protects innocent immigrants and children. She also asked the City to consider policies limiting the use of municipal property and local law-enforcement resources for federal immigration enforcement. View minutes, page 2

    • Mary Mitchell, an American Fork resident, supported an independent review of the Police Department and urged the city to rebuild public trust, particularly among vulnerable and immigrant communities. She requested greater transparency regarding the Police Department’s cooperation with ICE under Utah County’s 287(g) Agreement, citing concerns about racial profiling and residents becoming afraid to contact law enforcement. View minutes, page 2

    • Roy Shaw, an American Fork resident, requested an independent third-party review of the Police Department’s accountability, leadership, and handling of alleged misconduct. He stated that the review should determine whether systemic or leadership failures exist, restore public confidence, and guide any appropriate personnel action. He also expressed concern that similar requests from residents had received no meaningful response. View minutes, page 2

    • Andrea Tamita, a 93-year-old American Fork citizen, urged City officials and residents to address wrongdoing, hold public officials and safety patrols accountable, and protect children. View minutes, page 3

    • Elizabeth Oscarson, an American Fork resident, opposed ICE activity within the city and stated that residents deserve to feel safe. She requested complete transparency and public reporting regarding interactions between City departments and federal immigration authorities. View minutes, page 3

    • Gregory Titus stated that his and his wife’s constitutional rights had been violated in American Fork. He expressed a willingness to work with City officials and invited them to contact him regarding his concerns. View minutes, page 3

• August 11, 2026 — Truth in Taxation Public Hearing

  • American Fork City Council — Truth in Taxation Public Hearing Minutes — August 11, 2026 (Corrected)
  • Public Comments

    • Aaron Booker stated he does not live in American Fork. Earlier this year, he was stopped in Farmington by an American Fork police officer under the false guise of an HOV violation. He stated the encounter escalated unnecessarily, with Officer Kitchen resorting to threats when he declined to comply with Officer Kitchen’s unlawful order. Officer Kitchen then refused to complete the purpose of the stop despite his requests for a citation so he could handle this in court. He noted he filed a complaint with the American Fork Police Department days later. Shortly after the recording of the stop went viral, Officer Kitchen then called and delivered a forced apology. Mr. Booker accepted that until he obtained a copy of the police report which was written after the apology and contained false statements. Mr. Booker stated that Officer Kitchen works as a school resource officer, and he felt the city should not allow this officer to continue serving as an SRO. The city’s inactions speak volumes and signal their willingness to tolerate abuse of authority. He noted that he will help motivate the city with a civil right lawsuit. View minutes, page 3

    • Daniel Sroka stated he was an accountant, so he loves numbers. To raise $502,000 in taxes, it increases the resident property tax by $33.41 per resident. He also knows that lawsuits are expensive, which includes legal and settlement fees. There are many future lawsuits that will come. That would be about $50 per resident. Why do the residents have to pay for the lawsuits? The residents are the ones who pay because of the city’s incapability to uphold the constitution. It comes out of their pockets. View minutes, page 3 · View minutes, page 4

    • Gregory Hazard has shared with them that he has been a victim of the police department twice, and he explained those incidents. He noted that for those incidents, he has received apology letters. He noted he shared with them two months ago and only Council Member Hunter reached out to him to make sure he was satisfied. In June, Council Member Hunter noted the threats they have received. He wanted to make it clear that there was no room for threats on anyone. He came here two weeks ago on his concerns of Officer Kitchen. It was okay to agree to disagree. He was glad he was on the side of protecting children. He hoped the city was right, but if he was right then they all lose. View minutes, page 4

    • Heidi Barben stated she was one more voice that was concerned about the police force. She also had a weird incident several years ago. With her situation, and other situations, there seems to be lack of education or knowledge. She wanted to see more improvements for training. They needed to put victims first. She did not think it was being emphasized properly, and it was concerning. View minutes, page 4

    • John Mulholland stated he is a resident who has been here for many years. He was concerned about stewardship of finances. He mentioned the city had recently signed an agreement with CentraCom. He has heard about lawsuits, and he has asked for a citizens review board. They also put up a big curb extension by his house that will be a hazard for bikes. He appreciated what they did, but he was concerned about some of the expenses. View minutes, page 4

    • Julie Rodriguez thanked them for the opportunity to speak. She was a resident of the county but frequents American Fork. They still have not seen accountability and transparency within the Police Department. While she supports police departments, she was disappointed and does not trust this department or city. She wondered what it would take to get an interview with the mayor about what was going on. View minutes, page 4

    • Curtis Grahm stated he lives in the more historic part of the city. He understands the need for property taxes to maintain infrastructure. However, he was reminded of the wisdom of Benjamin Franklin who said to be cautious of the small expenses; a small leak will sink a mighty ship. A previous citizen noted that they should make small incremental tax increases, but he did not agree with that. Mr. Grahm stated there may have been a great amount of deliberation, but he feels like there is not much proof of the deliberation or of their due diligence. He requested a more robust explanation on the cuts in the budget. If they are making those cuts, they could increase those cuts slightly more to reach a more equitable tax increase. He also asked for greater clarity on the fire fighter’s wages. He was also concerned about the police and flock cameras. He also requested the council bring back the original comments section to provide feedback on the city’s website; the system was changed and he was not sure where to find it. View minutes, page 5

    • Steve Goodwin stated for years he was the pressman that printed the AF Citizen from 1980 to 2005. He was a concerned citizen wondering what was going on with the police department. He asked if there would be a meeting where the citizens would be told what was going on. He asked if they would be held accountable. View minutes, page 5

  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Mayor’s follow-up to an AFPD accountability concern

      • Background: Julie Rodriguez asked how she could obtain an interview with the mayor about AFPD accountability and transparency. Mayor Bradley Frost requested her contact information, but the published minutes do not record a substantive response to the concerns she raised. Relevant passage from the official meeting minutes: Julie Rodriguez stated that residents still had not seen accountability and transparency within the Police Department. While she supported police departments, she said she was disappointed and did not trust the department or city. She asked what it would take to get an interview with the mayor about what was going on. Mayor Frost asked her to provide her information to the city recorder. View minutes, page 4

• July 28, 2026 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — July 28, 2026
  • Public Comments

    • Angela Boban criticized the conduct and purpose of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, asserting that its activities create fear and harm within communities and may affect individuals based on their perceived immigration status. She urged American Fork City to adopt an executive order or formal resolution prohibiting federal agents from using City-owned schools, parks, libraries, and public buildings for immigration-enforcement activities and called for ICE to be abolished. View minutes, page 2

    • Daniel Sroka reminded City officials and police officers of their oaths to uphold the Constitution and argued that they had a responsibility to address alleged misconduct within the Police Department. He stated that this was his fourth Council meeting and that he had not received a city response regarding concerns he previously raised. He urged residents who had experienced or witnessed alleged police misconduct to attend the August 11 Council meeting, exercise their right to speak, and hold the City accountable. View minutes, page 2

    • Gregory Hazard expressed opposition to Officer Bronson Kitchen continuing to serve as the school resource officer at American Fork Junior High School. Citing incidents that he characterized as involving aggression, retaliation, and failures to follow safety protocols, Mr. Hazard questioned whether Officer Kitchen was an appropriate example for students and raised concerns about student safety and potential City liability. He urged the city to reevaluate the assignment and inform parents so they could make informed decisions regarding their children. View minutes, page 2

    • Jan Chamberlain asked City leaders and the Police Department to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement only when agents present a warrant signed by a judge. She expressed concern about immigration-enforcement practices, emphasized the importance of protecting all people, and stated that immigrants should be properly vetted while retaining their legal right to seek asylum through lawful processes. View minutes, page 2 · View minutes, page 3

    • Kambria Wong, a lifelong American Fork resident and criminal justice graduate who works with incarcerated youth, discussed her personal connection to immigrant families as the child of an immigrant. She expressed appreciation that the American Fork Police Department had not used its facilities for federal immigration enforcement and asked the City Council to consider a formal resolution or executive action prohibiting federal immigration agents from using City-or county-owned properties for enforcement activities. She emphasized that all residents should feel safe in the community and requested an opportunity to discuss the proposal further with City representatives. Mayor Frost asked whom Ms. Wong believed would be the most appropriate City representative to meet with and offered to meet with her personally to discuss the proposal. He asked Ms. Wong to complete a contact form so that they could arrange a meeting to discuss her concerns. View minutes, page 2

  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Response to proposed immigration-enforcement policy

      • Background: A resident asked the city to adopt a policy limiting the use of city- or county-owned property for federal immigration enforcement. Mayor Bradley Frost offered to discuss the proposal with her. Relevant passage from the official meeting minutes: Kambria Wong asked the City Council to consider a formal resolution or executive action prohibiting federal immigration agents from using City- or county-owned properties for enforcement activities. Mayor Frost asked whom Ms. Wong believed would be the most appropriate City representative to meet with and offered to meet with her personally to discuss the proposal. He asked Ms. Wong to complete a contact form so that they could arrange a meeting to discuss her concerns. View minutes, page 2

• July 14, 2026 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — July 14, 2026
  • Public Comments

    • Brian Kleiner, a Utah County resident, addressed the Council regarding a recent police investigation. He stated that he had closely followed the matter and expressed concerns about the conduct of the investigation, alleging that the individual involved had been improperly targeted despite not committing any illegal acts. Mr. Kleiner further asserted that the search warrant had been obtained through misleading information, that no evidence was found during its execution, and that an individual had been harmed during the incident. Mr. Kleiner questioned why no apparent accountability measures have been taken regarding the officers involved or the Police Chief. He also expressed concern about the City's oversight of the Police Department and asked when the public could expect to regain confidence in the City's leadership and law enforcement. View minutes, page 3

    • Daniel Sroka stated that he had emailed several exhibit handouts to the Council earlier that day for review. He said the first exhibit included a publicly available Brady list and asserted that several American Fork police officers had been included because of recent enforcement actions. He expressed concern that Brady-related credibility issues could undermine officer testimony in criminal proceedings and negatively affect public safety. Mr. Sroka stated that his second exhibit referenced the Police Department's body-worn camera policy, specifically the provisions governing when officers may stop or mute recordings. He alleged that his review of body camera footage revealed multiple instances in which officers did not comply with the policy and suggested the conduct reflected a broader departmental practice. He explained that his third exhibit cited provisions of Utah law concerning adverse inference jury instructions related to body-worn camera recordings, asserting that repeated intentional or reckless violations of recording requirements could have legal consequences. Mr. Sroka stated that his final exhibit compared American Fork's policies with those of Salt Lake City, noting that the other agency required officers to document the reason whenever a body camera recording was stopped, required supervisory review of such incidents during critical events, and conducted regular audits of body camera recordings. He encouraged the city to consider adopting similar accountability measures. View minutes, page 3

  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Response to police-investigation concerns

      • Background: Brian Kleiner raised concerns about a police investigation and city oversight during the public-comment period. His complete comment is presented in the Public Comments section for this meeting. Mayor Bradley Frost explained the council’s public-comment procedures and offered to follow up privately. Read Brian Kleiner’s public comment Relevant response from the official meeting minutes: Mayor Frost responded that the Council does not engage in dialogue during the public comment portion of the meeting but offered to meet with Mr. Kleiner privately to discuss his concerns in greater detail. He asked Mr. Kleiner to complete a public comment form with his contact information so a meeting could be arranged and stated that he would personally follow up with him. Mr. Kleiner indicated that he would like the meeting to be recorded. View minutes, page 3

• June 23, 2026 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — June 23, 2026
  • Public Comments

    • Daniel Swenson thanked the Council for stating that it would listen to community concerns regarding police conduct and referenced a recent public demonstration on the issue. He cited several incidents that he characterized as examples of police misconduct, including matters involving search warrants, traffic stops, residential encounters, and use-of-force allegations, some of which he noted are the subject of litigation. Mr. Swenson urged the City not only to listen to community concerns but also to implement meaningful changes to protect residents' rights. View minutes, page 5

    • Rod Martin, Chair of the American Fork Chamber of Commerce and a local business owner, expressed appreciation for the City's partnership with the Chamber in organizing Steel Days. He stated that the event has continued to grow through the efforts of businesses, volunteers, sponsors, City staff, and community members, and expressed confidence that the Chamber can continue to successfully manage the celebration. Mr. Martin also supported the use of appropriate conflict-of-interest safeguards, including recusal by elected officials who have professional relationships with the Chamber, to maintain transparency and public trust. He concluded by expressing appreciation for the City's police officers and encouraged the community to recognize the difficult nature of their work and extend them grace and support. View minutes, page 5

• June 9, 2026 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — June 9, 2026 (Corrected)
  • Public Comments

    • Daniel Sroka commented on the proposed budget and expressed concern that the city could face significant costs from potential civil litigation related to alleged police misconduct. He referenced several incidents involving the Police Department, disputed the accuracy of public statements made by the Police Chief regarding one case, and alleged improper police actions during an arrest. Mr. Sroka stated that these events had diminished his confidence in the Police Department and urged the city to address his concerns regarding accountability and public trust. View minutes, page 2

    • Alex Sabin criticized the American Fork Police Department's handling of public records and accountability, alleging that the department has prioritized institutional interests over constitutional rights. Referring to a prior case, he argued that public trust has been undermined and urged the city to take corrective action. Mr. Sabin called on the City Council to authorize an independent third-party audit of the Police Department, stating that greater accountability and transparency are needed to restore public confidence. View minutes, page 4

    • Chris Hubbard expressed concerns about the American Fork Police Department's online complaint submission system, stating that it does not provide confirmation of successful submissions, clear error messages, or preserve information when errors occur. He argued that these issues make it unnecessarily difficult for residents to file complaints and requested improvements to the system, including confirmation emails with complaint numbers, detailed error notifications, and the ability to return to complete forms when corrections are needed. The speaker stated that these changes would improve accessibility and better protect the public's ability to submit complaints. View minutes, page 4

    • Hazard’s City Council handout documenting the department’s findings — June 9, 2026 (redacted)

    • Gregory Hazard submitted letters from Police Chief Paul and a 2024 news article for the Council's review before speaking. He stated that, based on his professional background and personal experiences, he wished to address concerns involving the American Fork Police Department. Mr. Hazard described two incidents in which he believed he was treated inappropriately by police officers. He stated that Police Chief Paul later apologized on behalf of the City and Police Department, acknowledged that the officers' conduct was inappropriate, and took corrective action, including rescinding a criminal trespass order issued against him. While expressing appreciation for Chief Paul's leadership and willingness to accept responsibility, Mr. Hazard emphasized the importance of accountability and maintaining public trust in the Police Department. View minutes, page 4 · View minutes, page 5

    • August Hicks expressed concerns regarding the American Fork Police Department's handling of an investigation involving a business dispute over collectible items. He alleged that law enforcement actions taken during the investigation were excessive and improperly interfered with civil legal proceedings, including interactions involving the investigator and service of court documents. Mr. Hicks stated that these events had diminished public confidence in the Police Department and urged the city to conduct an investigation into the officers involved and take appropriate disciplinary action if misconduct is found. View minutes, page 5

    • Julie Rodriguez expressed appreciation for the service provided by law enforcement while acknowledging recent public concerns involving the Police Department. She encouraged the mayor and other public officials to review the issues that have been raised, fulfill their responsibilities, and ensure appropriate action is taken where necessary. Ms. Rodriguez stated that she believes the community can move forward positively and expressed her continued support for local law enforcement and efforts to maintain public trust. View minutes, page 5

  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Council response after police-accountability public comments

      • Background: Residents raised several AFPD accountability concerns during public comment. In their later reports, all five council members and the mayor thanked participants or said the council listened to public input, but the published minutes do not record any of them directly addressing the specific allegations. Relevant discussion from the official meeting minutes: Council Member Hunter thanked everyone who attended and participated in public comment, expressing appreciation for the community's engagement. He also expressed appreciation for the American Fork Police Department and thanked officers who had recently assisted his family after they were targeted in an incident. Council Member Holley thanked those who participated in public comments, stated that civic engagement strengthens the community, and assured them that the Council takes those comments seriously. Council Member John thanked residents for their comments and correspondence, said he had read every message even when he could not respond to each one, and stated that the feedback helped the Council better understand residents’ concerns. Council Member Carroll said hearing directly from the public was valuable. She noted that meeting requirements prevented council members from engaging in dialogue or asking follow-up questions during public comment, but said they listened carefully and that comments sometimes raised issues she had not previously known about. Council Member Taylor expressed appreciation for the turnout and respectful participation. He recognized both those who serve and protect the community and residents who advocate for issues they care about, and said local government is where community concerns are addressed most directly. Mayor Frost thanked residents for participating respectfully, assured them that the Council had heard their comments and would carefully consider the issues raised, and reaffirmed the Council’s commitment to working with the community to address concerns and find solutions. View minutes, page 5 · View minutes, page 6

• June 2, 2026 — Work Session

  • American Fork City Council — Work Session Minutes — June 2, 2026
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Victim Advocacy Program operations and law-enforcement response

      • Background: The council reviewed victim-service demand, follow-up practices, reactions to arrests, community partnerships, referrals, reparations, and how advocates carry victims’ concerns into the prosecution process. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: Ms. Whiting presented the Victim Advocacy Program's quarterly statistics and provided an overview of services delivered during the reporting period. For the third quarter, covering January through March, the program served 218 victims, including both primary victims and secondary victims such as children who were present during incidents or otherwise affected by the events. Domestic violence continued to be the largest service category. Advocates provided 1,653 service contacts and assistance activities, including follow-up contacts, referrals, safety planning, resource coordination, and other advocacy services. Council Member Hunter asked for clarification regarding the statistics, noting that the report showed 218 victims were served but 342 victims contacted. Ms. Whiting explained that the 218 figure reflected individual victims who received services, while the 342 contacts included repeated follow-up, court notifications, welfare checks, resource coordination, and contact through a non-offending parent when children were involved. Mayor Frost noted that victims respond differently to law enforcement actions, with some feeling relieved and others struggling because of their relationship with the offender. Ms. Whiting agreed, explaining that advocates help victims understand their options, process events, and focus on safety and recovery. Council Member Carroll asked whether the program serves both American Fork and Cedar Hills, and Ms. Whiting confirmed that it does, with most cases originating in American Fork. Carroll also asked whether demand had increased as the city grew. Ms. Whiting said service levels were roughly 50 percent higher than six years earlier and that adding Ms. Nordin had helped the program keep pace. City Administrator Bunker asked about key community partners and referrals for victims needing more extensive assistance. The advocates identified The Refuge and the Children's Justice Center and explained that the City’s advocates provide crisis intervention, emotional support, education, and guidance through the criminal justice process while connecting victims to community partners for counseling, shelter, and ongoing support. Council Member Holley asked whether advocates help connect victims with therapists and other professional services. Ms. Whiting said the program provides referrals and resource lists but does not recommend specific providers. Council Member John asked about crime victim reparations funding. Ms. Nordin explained that eligible victims may receive financial assistance for crime-related medical care, counseling, relocation, and other expenses. She added that advocates meet weekly with the City’s prosecutor to discuss cases and communicate victims’ concerns and desired outcomes. View minutes, page 12 · View minutes, page 13 · View minutes, page 14

    • Police facility planning and public-safety impact fees

      • Background: Consultants presented the assumptions and service-demand data supporting proposed public-safety impact fees, including a planned police facility and increasing police call volume. No council member is recorded making a substantive police-specific comment during this portion. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: Susan Becker of Zions Public Finance explained that the analysis assumed construction of a new police facility in approximately 2028 at an estimated cost of roughly $13 million. Public-safety impact fees were calculated from facility costs and the number of police and fire calls generated by different types of development. City staff categorized police and fire calls by land-use type. The analysis found that a typical single-family residence generated approximately 1.23 police calls per year. Ms. Becker noted that police call volumes had increased over time and that some calls involved alarms and other routine service requests. The methodology combined capital cost per service call with average demand to calculate the maximum supportable fee. The proposed police facility’s estimated cost was divided by its planned square footage to establish a cost-per-square-foot figure. Impact fees could fund qualifying capital assets but not ongoing expenses such as personnel. Although police and fire impacts were calculated separately, Utah law treated them as components of one public-safety impact fee. View minutes, page 20 · View minutes, page 21

• March 24, 2026 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — March 24, 2026
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Renewal of Cedar Hills public-safety services agreement

      • Background: The council approved the interlocal agreement under which American Fork provides police and other public-safety services to Cedar Hills. This was a significant operational contract, although the minutes contain little substantive council discussion. Relevant passage from the official meeting minutes: Review and action on an agreement with Cedar Hills for public safety services. Mayor Frost noted that Cedar Hills has passed this agreement. Council Member Carroll thanked staff for their work on this, commenting that she hoped this would be fair for both parties. Council Member Taylor moved to approve the public safety services agreement between American Fork City and Cedar Hills and authorize the city to sign the necessary documents. Council Member Carroll seconded the motion. Voting was as follows: Result: Approved Mover: Council Member Taylor Seconder: Council Member Carroll Yes: Staci Carroll, Tim Holley, Ryan Hunter, Clark Taylor Absent: Ernie John View minutes, page 8

• February 19–20, 2026 — Budget Workshop

  • American Fork City Council — Budget Workshop Minutes — February 19–20, 2026
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Police/courts construction and police staffing priorities

      • Background: The workshop recorded an important facility milestone—the police/courts project had moved from design to bidding—and retained police staffing among the city’s high-priority needs. The cited expenditure figure covers police and fire together and should not be read as a police-only percentage. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: Police and Courts. The design has been completed, and the bid has been out for construction. Ms. Montoy went over the expenditures. Personnel was the largest expense in the general fund; however, citywide the largest was capital expenditures. She went over the expenditures by department, pointing out public safety was approximately 54% of the expenditures. She compared the general fund expenditures according to type. Personnel increased, but operations and transfers decreased. The expenditure increase was about 1.5%. The high priority items included: • Staffing Needs – fire and police personnel. View minutes, page 3 · View minutes, page 4 · View minutes, page 10

• 2025

• August 26, 2025 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — August 26, 2025
  • Public Comments

    • Gregory Hazard was there to address the mayor and council regarding ADA compliance. He is a father of two disabled children and has an investment in this community as a property owner. He loves American Fork. He has a concern about two handicap stalls on city property. He pointed out the requirements for handicap stalls and that the handicap stall is not correct, suggesting two stalls be placed closer to the building. Mr. Hazard commented the city was home to Dan Peterson school, ATECH, Developmental Center, and the city was a beacon in Utah County for special needs. He felt they could be compliant, and he pointed out where two potential ADA stalls would be best. Mr. Hazard then stated he counted 53 painted stalls at the police department, and for that many stalls they need 3 to 4 handicap stalls. We want to give back to the community and asked the city to take these comments into consideration. View minutes, page 2

  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Millet Massage business-license revocation hearing

      • Background: Police Chief Cameron Paul presented the police investigation and requested revocation. Attorney Run-Zhi Lai, representing the business, disputed the evidence and argued that revocation would violate due process. Council members questioned the evidence and business practices, received legal guidance from City Attorney Heather Schriever, adopted findings, and unanimously revoked the license. Key points written for this site: • Police Chief Cameron Paul described the investigation and asked the council to revoke the business license. • Attorney Run-Zhi Lai disputed the evidence, raised due-process concerns, and defended the business’s practices. • Council members questioned the evidence, licensing, employee housing, and the business’s responsibility for its employees; City Attorney Heather Schriever explained the council’s decision options. • The council adopted findings and unanimously revoked the license.

      • Read the complete relevant minutes passage

        • Official meeting minutes: Police Chief Cameron Paul came forward to give an overview of why they were here tonight. He explained this involves two cases involving Millet Massage. On May 18, 2025, a citizen called in to report a masseuse exposed this individual’s genitals and offered sexual services. This person declined and then contacted police, and they opened an investigation into this business. Throughout the investigation, they continued to monitor this business. On June 26, 2025, Sargent Tholl stopped a vehicle leaving the business, the individual ultimately admitted to them he had received sexual favors that day and on several previous visits. Chief Paul stated that this individual was cooperating with them. On June 30, 2025, another patron was stopped and admitted that on this occasion and prior occasions he had received sexual services in exchange for payment. As a result, a search warrant was procured and served on July 10, 2025. They had homeland security investigation agents with them to help interpret. They interviewed two female workers who denied they provided those services. However, pictures were given to one of the male patrons who confirmed their identity. The employees both indicated they do not know where the boss lives and they often stay overnight in the business. On Paul noted there were items seized as part of the investigation. Chief Paul continued explaining that after they were charged, on July 31, 2025, an individual reported her husband had been there and had been offered $200 in exchange for intercourse, which he did not accept. They opened another case, and on August 7, 2025, Sgt. Tholl stopped another vehicle leaving the business where the patron ultimately admitted he received sexual services in exchange for pay. Chief Paul stated this investigation is ongoing. Chief Paul stated the business license appears to have been issued in December 2024. As part of that, they are required to sign an acknowledgement that says they agree to conduct business strictly in accordance with American Fork City codes governing such business and swearing under penalty of law that the information contained was true and correct and that to falsify information on the application was grounds for denial or revocation of the license and other penalties as allowed by law. Chief Paul stated the main city code they looked at was Chapter 5.44, which is business licenses for massage therapy practices. He read Section 5.44.050(b) “It is unlawful for a massage technician, massage apprentice, or any employee of a massage establishment to massage or touch or offer to massage or touch the specified anatomical areas, as defined in Section 5.34.040, of customers.” He noted the definition for specified anatomical areas is the human male or female pubic area. Chief Paul stated that Section 5.44.050(c) also prohibits any sexual activity, stating it is unlawful for the massage technician, massage apprentice, or any customer or employee of the massage establishment, to engage in any specified sexual activity, which in this case under code is the act of masturbation. Chief Paul continued that Section 5.44.060 states that any violation of this chapter is punishable by a Class B Misdemeanor and may result in the revocation of the business license. Based on this information, he requested the city council consider revocation of the business license, particularly since charges have been filed and the activity was still occurring inside the business. Mr. Run-Zhi Lai stated he has been retained by the business to represent them. He passed out documents to the mayor and council. Mr. Lai stated the council heard from the police chief, but he pointed out they were all alleged charges. He stated the two employees have been charged but have not been found guilty. The police did conduct a raid on July 10, 2025, and he encouraged the council to review the body cam footage and review the evidence collected. Mr. Lai stated the evidence presented tonight is hearsay. The police chief says that someone made a report that he was offered sexual services at the business. The police did the investigation, and if they listened to the recording, the person made it clear that he was not wearing underwear when he went to the business and that he used a towel he said was a pillowcase. All the towels are regular sized towels. Mr. Lai stated the business has signage in each room that all customers must wear underwear during service and they can’t completely undress. That person made a statement that he went to Mexico and received a similar service, so he assumed he could in the state, but he was never offered that. Mr. Lai stated the person said that someone provided the service lifted up the towel and asked yes. He interpreted that as an offer of sexual service. Mr. Lai pointed out that in the recording, the person that instigated that investigation made a statement that they were Asian, so he should have known. He did not know if they targeted that business, but that was how the investigation started. The Police Chief also reported they started an investigation, they pulled someone over, and they made a statement that they received a sexual service at a business. Those people are not here to make that statement or accusation; he hoped they would show up in court case to make that accusation. He restated this is hearsay, and it can’t be upheld in a court of law. Mr. Lai commented that with that said, he would like them to look at the exhibits he passed out which included pictures of how the business was set up and of the notice on the wall. He stated this was a clean setup. The rooms have the beds and the signage in the rooms saying they can’t undress completely and that they have the right to refuse service. Exhibit 2 shows how the owner deals with it. He has them sign an agreement saying they have to follow the law and they can’t offer sexual services, which was a way for the business owner to protect themselves. Mr. Lai continued that also only hire employees with at least two years of experience. They also offering training before they start employment on what they can and cannot do and how to protect themselves, such as leaving the door ajar as a little bit for protection for the patrons as well as the masseuse. Mr. Lai stated the police still targets this business. In the initial investigation, when the officer called the reporting party, he made a comment in that call that it happened before, and they changed the name. The police officer admitted they were targeting this business without evidence that they are doing something shady. That is not how they run their business, nor has the police found evidence. The raid did not find anything. Mr. Lai stated he did not know how they ID’d those employees, and he did not think the police followed the proper procedure. The person who made the initial report stated he did not think he could identify those employees. He questioned what kind of photo lineup the police used to identify the employees. Mr. Lai stated there was due process that needed to be followed. The police chief asked the council to revoke the business license without having someone convicted. Someone has been charged, and they are the employees of the business. The owner was not listed in the case, nor can the conduct of the employees be linked to the business owner. He urged the council to consider that it was the employees and not the owner and not revoke the license since there is no evidence. Mr. Lai stated the business owner will make sure nothing similar will happen. They plan on increasing training for all future employees. The two employees who have been charged are no longer working for this business. They also will have more supervision, and the supervisor will stay there for a longer time to make sure nothing happens. If training is necessary, they will contact a massage school to provide training. He stated it was difficult to run small businesses. Mr. Lai stated there are people who come to this business and make a threat saying they have been hired by the police to report them, and if they don’t pay them, they will report them to the police. He stated people also come to this business because they are Asian, and they don’t speak English. The patrons take advantage of them. The business owner has said they have had to refund over 30 customers because they made sexual advances on the massage therapist. Mr. Lai concluded by stating there are two sides to the story. So far, the case has not been proved, and the business has not been shown to have done anything improper or violated the terms of their business license. Mayor Frost turned the time over to Heather Schriever. She stated at this time the council should take into consideration evidence submitted that is part of the record and determine whether or not they feel a sufficient amount evidence has been presented to revoke the business license of Millet Massage based on violations of Chapter 5 that have been outlined by Chief Paul. If the council has any specific questions about the ordinances or standards, she would be happy to address them. Council Member Holley asked Chief Paul if the employees have the right to work in the United States, to which Chief Paul did not have that information. Council Member Holley asked if the employees were sleeping at the business. Chief Paul confirmed the employees admitted they were living there. It was noted that residing in a commercial zone is usually not permitted. Council Member Holley confirmed there were three or four separate, unconnected people who have received these services. Chief Paul responded that they had three documented cases, and those individuals made those statements knowing they could be charged. Council Member Holley asked the employees were fired because they did something wrong. Mr. Lai stated they were not fired, but the employment relationship with the business was terminated. Council Member Holley asked for clarification if the doors were open and the customers had to wear underwear. Mr. Lai responded that it was correct, to which Council Member Holley commented was atypical. Council Member Holley stated this was not a criminal case, but a revocation of a business license. However, he hears there are multiple people stating this has happened, there are employees living there that shouldn’t be living there, and there are employees who have been fired. Mr. Lai injected that it was his understanding they had areas set up for the employees to rest in the lower areas. They would spend a night occasionally if they didn’t have transportation. They have apartments and do not live there full time. Council Member Holley found no reason to keep the business open for the safety and integrity of this community. Mr. Lai stated that allegations were not evidence, but Council Member Holley disagreed and stated that terminated employees were evidence and they wouldn’t terminate employees if they weren’t doing something wrong. Another issue was the fact that they knew the employees stayed there overnight. Mr. Lai stated he disagreed, but the council has the right to make a decision. He commented that there are allegations and questions about whether the employees voluntarily left, but that had nothing to do with the business and there was no indication of violation of the business code or license agreement. Council Member Taylor commented Mr. Lai stated they would implement training, and he questioned if they are licensed in Utah to be a masseuse. Mr. Lai stated the training they would ask for was how to train them on how to handle the situation, such as balancing privacy and asking for sexual services. He noted it was atypical to leave a door open, but the owner was suggesting the door stay ajar so the customer would still feel comfortable. Council Member Taylor appreciated Mr. Lai’s comments. He was sure that when they were in a legitimate school, they would get that training regarding illegal activity and decorum. He wondered if they were licensed. Council Member Taylor stated the need to secure the legitimacy of massage therapy places to be either connected to a spa or physical therapy or medical plaza. Mr. Lai stated the license and employment were different issues. Mayor Frost stated that it was part of the equation. Council Member Carroll stated their role was to determine whether there was evidence of things that were going against code. She felt the statements the chief has made, not about things that will happen in court, but the allegations made are evidence for her whether it violations city code. Mr. Lai stated that it was not to the court’s standard. This was an administrative decision that can still be reviewed by the court. The decision can’t be arbitrary or capricious. At this time, if they decide to revoke the license based on allegations, and those people are not even present to give the business owner a chance to face their accuser, it was arbitrary. They do not have concrete evidence. The business license is a property right, and to take away a property right, it must follow due process. This isn’t the court of law, but they need to follow similar rules. The council must have concrete evidence before they revoke the license. Council Member John stated the two employees are no longer working there and he questioned why. Mr. Lai explained it was because they have been accused of wrongdoing, and they can’t work during this process. Mr. Lai continued that they have to work, so they moved to a different state to get employment. Council Member John asked if there were new employees and if there were, were they licensed by the State of Utah? Mr. Lai would have to find out. Council Member Hunter stated he understood that the two individuals are no longer working and have been moved out of state. He questioned if they have been moved out of state for other employment. Mr. Lai stated that was his understanding. Council Member Hunter commented that sounded like trafficking, which was brought up in the evidence in Exhibit 2 presented by the business. Council Member Hunter stated that the last page talks about no forced or suspected human trafficking. Council Member Hunter commented they admitted that they have taken those employees to another state to find another employment because it was not working here. That was his interpretation of human trafficking. Council Member Hunter stated that Mr. Lai indicated they needed to have evidence of how people paid and be able to track those payments associated with those people’s visits. He asked if there was anything collected in the raid that would lead them to believe that would not be able to be done. Chief Paul answered that he knew the payments were made in cash but did not have the information in front of him on if there was a log. Chief Paul thought it would be difficult to tie that to the patrons. He noted they seized $5,000 in cash, and he was unsure if they had the ability to take credit cards. Ms. Schriever stated if the council wants to consider additional evidence, they can table this. If they feel that substantial evidence has been presented, they could move forward with a decision. Council Member Taylor read the findings of fact regarding the revocation of the business license of Millett Massage SPA LLC: Applicable Law: 1. Under American Fork City Code Chapter 5.04, the City Council may revoke a business license if the licensee engages in unlawful activity, violates applicable state laws, codes or standards of professional ethics, city ordinances, or permits criminal conduct on the premises. 2. Under American Fork City Code §5.44.050, it is unlawful for any employee, customer, or massage technician in a massage establishment to engage in prohibited activity on the premises. 3. Under American Fork City Code § 5.44.060 any violation of Chapter 5 of the American Fork City Code may result in the revocation of a business license. 4. Utah Code § 58-47b-501 et seq. the Massage Therapy Practice Act prohibits massage therapists or massage establishments from engaging in unlawful conduct. 5. Utah Admin. Code R156-47b-502 defines what constitutes unprofessional conduct by a massage therapist or massage establishment. Findings 1. Millett Massage received notice of this hearing as required by American Fork City Code § 5.04.230. 2. Millet Massage has appeared at the revocation hearing. 3. Millett Massage employees engaged in activity in violation of American Fork City Code §5.44.050. 4. Multiple customers corroborated they have received prohibited services at the premises. 5. Two employees of Millett Massage have been criminally charged based on conduct occurring at the licensed premises. 6. The two employees of Millett Massage have engaged in unprofessional conduct as defined in Utah Admin. Code and unlawful conduct as defined by Utah Code. This is a violation of the applicable professional ethics of massage therapists and massage establishments. 7. The massage establishment is responsible for the conduct of its employees. It has arranged or allowed prohibited acts to occur on the premises and allowed employees to sleep at the premises. The unlawful acts of employees are imputed to the licensee for purposes of business license revocation. 8. The licensee’s operation of Millet Massage is inconsistent with representations made in the license application and violates city ordinances regulating massage establishments and is in violation of Utah State Code and applicable city’s ordinances. 9. The continued operation of Millet Massage poses a risk to the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of American Fork City and the public interest will be best served by revocation. Council Member Hunter moved to revoke the business license of Millet Massage SPA LLC located at 377 East 60 South pursuant to American Fork City Code Chapter 5.04 based on the foregoing findings of fact: (1) Millett Massage SPA LLC has violated American Fork City Code Chapter 5; (2) Millett Massage SPA LLC has violated applicable state law and the code of professional ethics for the licensee’s profession; (3) Sufficient grounds exist for revocation of the business license; And ORDER that the business license be cancelled and revoked. Council member Holley seconded the motion. Voting was as follows: RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Ryan Hunter, Council Member SECONDER: Tim Holley, Council Member YES: Carroll, Hunter, Holley, John, Taylor View minutes, page 4 · View minutes, page 5 · View minutes, page 6 · View minutes, page 7 · View minutes, page 8 · View minutes, page 9 · View minutes, page 10

• February 20–21, 2025 — Budget Workshop

  • American Fork City Council — Budget Workshop Minutes — February 20–21, 2025
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Police organizational health, space, evidence storage, and costs

      • Background: Chief Cameron Paul described the pressures affecting officer retention and wellness, as well as space, parking, vehicles, equipment, and technology. The resulting strategic plan included police/courts improvements and evidence storage at Station 52. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: Police. Chief Paul sent over the needs of the Police Department. As previously stated, personnel were important. He noted that Lehi City intends to hire ten new officers, which will affect American Fork. There are three key issues the department is facing: organizational health, space, and increased cost. The organizational health of the department is important, as they are fighting the wage battle to try to keep officers from going to other jurisdictions for more money. Mental health is also important, and they appreciate the city’s support with that. The need for mental health assistance is important, and the council felt that assistance was vital to the personnel. The police department needs space, and although they have taken over the 3rd floor of the police/courts building, they will still need to address office space and parking space. The third issue was the increased cost in fleet, general equipment, and technology. There is a 48% increase since 2021, with a 60% increase in equipment for the fleet. That increase in cost affects everything. There is new technology coming out, but that is also an added expense. They are trying to be innovative with what they do to save money. Public Safety. The city should look at options for Station 51 expansion or temporary 53. Other items to consider are Station 53, ambulance and fire engine replacements, equipment replacement, and tenant improvements to 3rd floor of the police/courts building. The goals for FY 2026 are: • Public Facilities • Public Works • Fitness Center • Fire Station 53 • Fire Station 51 remodel • Police Department remodel of 3rd floor • Evidence at 52 View minutes, page 6 · View minutes, page 9 · View minutes, page 10

• 2024

• June 4, 2024 — Special and Work Session

  • American Fork City Council — Special and Work Session Minutes — June 4, 2024
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Two additional police officers in the proposed budget

      • Background: The fiscal-year 2025 budget proposal included two new police-officer positions. Relevant passage from the official meeting minutes: Ms. Montoya stated that there was a change this year. Road Capital projects fund was separated from the General Capital projects just so we can track that a little bit better. She mentioned it will move over to the fund balance after the audits to make sure that there are dedicated funds specifically for roads. She commented that she will bring forth the Certified Rate by next week when the budget gets approved and there will be no tax increase for this budget but is still waiting on the county to give those numbers to get the approval for next week. She mentioned that Station 53 site analysis and concept design is included in the budget for $50,000. Ms. Montoya added that there was $250,000 included for the downtown revitalization plan to get the ball rolling in the downtown area. She commented that are some FTE changes (see page 67 of Budget Book for explanation of charges). • The communications position went from part-time to full-time. • Parks has an additional 1.5 part-time season laborers. • Senior Center proposing a full-time administrative assistant or Senior Manager from part-time. • Police department – adding 2 additional police officers. • Fire department – adding 1.25 part-time firefighters to help with overtime costs. • Engineering added one full GIS technician. • Fitness Center allocation from the Senior Center Manager – it will be split between both. View minutes, page 5 · View minutes, page 6

    • Victim Assistance Program responsibilities and service volume

      • Background: AFPD victim advocates described their role following violent crime, including safety planning, referrals, protective orders, stalking injunctions, court notifications, and communication among victims, officers, investigators, prosecutors, and community providers. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: Report by Dawna Whiting on the American Fork Victim’s Assistance program. Ms. Whiting and Ms. Nordin introduced themselves and introduced Carrie Getty who has volunteered for many years with this program. AFPD VA provides: • Post-crisis supports to Victims of all violent crime. • Assess needs and provide referrals, assist with obtaining services. • Victims with appropriate educational and preventative information, develop safety plans and goals. • Act as liaison between victim, police officers, investigators, prosecutors, and community-based agencies. • Assist with applications for Crime Victims Reparations which provides reparation for therapy and reimbursement for abuse related medical bills. • Asses need for and assist with obtaining Protective Orders or Stalking injunctions. • Monitor Perpetrator court appearance and provide Victim with updates and court notifications, inform victims of their rights and protect their interest. • Aim to decrease recidivism, ensure victim safety, and hold batterer accountable. Ms. Whiting went over the number of victims they have served from October 2023 to March 2024. • 637 victims contacted. • 2,911 total services/assist. Ms. Whiting commented about the differences in numbers that they get from the number of victims versus the number of calls that they make, and it’s based on the victims’ needs. She reported they do all their normal intake with victims and call them to get a feel of what they need and how they can give them help through the next couple of months. She added they never know what the victims may need and go from there. Ms. Whiting reported that some of the victims aren’t all Police department victims, they could also be children of victims. Discussion about victim percentages and type of victims ensued between the AFPD VA board members and the Council. Ms. Whiting commented that anytime she counts a new victim in the quarter for the grant, it’s a new case, new victim and the services should be duplicated throughout other quarters. She added that her services could be duplicated throughout other quarters. Ms. Nordin mentioned that when they call the victims and give them resources, they track each time they give some type of help during that phone call or in person visit with them. Ms. Whiting did state the trend she is seeing is everyone is angrier and more demanding. She added most of the victims’ age range from 25 to 48 years old. The mayor thanked the board for their report. Mr. Bunker mentioned that Chief Paul has great things to say about the Victim’s Advocate program and how needed they are. View minutes, page 6 · View minutes, page 7

• February 22–23, 2024 — Budget Workshop

  • American Fork City Council — Budget Workshop Minutes — February 22–23, 2024
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Police staffing, facilities, evidence storage, and retention

      • Background: The workshop compared current staffing with a regional planning ratio and documented specific limitations in police space, secure evidence storage, parking, retention, mental-health support, vehicles, technology, and equipment. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: Mr. Bunker stated that population affects everything and went over the impact on communities. The next decade will be critical, when the city will see the biggest push in population growth. With the increased population, there will need to be more employees. Today, the city has 293 FTE for about 48,000 residents. The projections show they will need to increase to 323, then 360, and finally 468 in 20 years. With that, space is affected. Staff at Public Works are already in tight quarters. The Police Department has done well to manage what they have, but again, space is tight; soon, they should be able to expand to the 3rd floor which will help. Currently, there is no excess space to expand with the inevitable growth. The next 10 years will be a critical growth period for the city. The city will need another 110,000 square feet to house the employees, and the city needs in the future. One option would create precincts for the police, although that creates a different set of challenges. Police Chief Paul explained their biggest need is personnel. While there isn’t a magic number of how many officers they need per 1000 residents, the average is 1.3 officers per 1000. If they use that number, it will place them at 76 officers right now; today, they have 54 officers. He felt their officers did a great job. They hope to maintain an additional couple of officers a year, although that would affect the budget with wages, benefits, cars, equipment, training, etc. In addition to officers, they need space. The department has re-configured every space in their building to fit as many people in as possible. Another need is evidence storage and having secure storage. There is no parking at the police department, with days when they must park north of the city administration office. The loss of parking at the Fire Department and on Church Street will create problems. Chief Paul stated another challenge they will continue to face is wages. The competition has slowed down, but the city needs to remain competitive. Fleet costs are another challenge as is mental health services, technology, and gear. Mr. Bunker stated they have looked closely at staffing, and if wages aren’t increased for an officer within 5 or 10 years, they can go other places for more money. The city does have a program for advancement for officers, with another option being the step increase plan. Mr. Bunker explained that Public Works has the same growth pressures. They are working on a plan for a new facility as the current building is packed. They have purchased a few homes on the east of the current building and need to continue buying properties around the building. The plan would be to move the evidence storage facilities and expand the public works yard. They do have a proposal on master planning the space and what the needs will be for the next 20 years. View minutes, page 6 · View minutes, page 7

• 2022

• August 23, 2022 — Truth in Taxation Public Hearing

  • American Fork City Council — Truth in Taxation Public Hearing Minutes — August 23, 2022
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Police-service demand and the proposed property-tax increase

      • Background: At the public hearing, the city presented police-service demand and public-safety staffing as central reasons for increasing property-tax revenue. The mayor closed by stating that the prior level of public-safety service could not continue unchanged. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: Mr. Bunker explained why the city would consider a tax increase. There have been increases in public safety services and the cost of road improvements that are driving the need for additional revenue. As the general fund expenses grows over time, the value of the dollar and what can be done with that dollar decreases due to inflation and the city had less revenue to provide the same level of service. The demand for police services has risen 46.6% in the past five years, and fire/rescue service costs have risen 69%. As a side note, Mr. Bunker stated Station 51 was the busiest fire station in Utah County. The cost of street construction materials has increased 17.5% in the last year alone, and since 2010 road construction costs have increased an astounding 44%. In other words, the city can do less road improvements today with the same amount of dollars that we could have done in 2008. Mr. Bunker stated that without additional revenue, the city will go backwards in the level of service. Mr. Bunker stated some city departments have not increased personnel for decades. The city is growing, and we still have to provide services to all the residents. There have been additional personnel specifically in public safety, due to large call volumes. Mayor Frost vouched that they have elected officials that care for the community and all kind of people, from the fixed income to the affluent income. As a council, they will ponder on everything said tonight and take it into consideration. He stated that the Council does care for the residents and the communities. He mentioned that the city cannot continue to provide public safety in the manner the city has done in the past. He thanked everyone who was here tonight and happy to engage with the residents. View minutes, page 2 · View minutes, page 3 · View minutes, page 8

• August 23, 2022 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — August 23, 2022
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Station 52 shooting range and police-facility funding

      • Background: The council weighed the cost, safety, ownership, and timing of a police shooting range within the Station 52 project and discussed whether available police impact fees should instead advance a police-station project. Key points written for this site: • City Administrator David Bunker presented the construction cost and options to omit or defer completion of the shooting range. • Mayor Bradley Frost supported retaining the range, while council members discussed construction quality, public-safety priorities, Cedar Hills revenue, safety, and whether police impact fees should also advance a police station. • The council approved the amended construction contract, including the range, while authorizing staff to pursue value-engineering savings; Council Member Ryan Hunter abstained.

      • Read the complete relevant minutes passage

        • Official meeting minutes: Mr. Bunker reported that back in October 2020, American Fork city entered in a contract with SIRQ construction to build Fire Station 52. At that time, there were a lot of unknowns, specifically the guaranteed maximum price. As they did not have set plants, SIRQ could not go out and secure pricing for construction. As the city did not have property yet for the station, they were looking at a couple of sites in that vicinity. Now, the property has been secured and we are ready to move forward with construction. SIRQ has gone through and received bids from various sub-contractors. Within that, the city looked into the process with Value Engineering of certain items and there is a potential for some savings up to $150,000 to $300,000. Before the council was a cost estimate for the fire station. Mr. Bunker then went over the where the revenues will come from and where the costs are for Station 52. He explained the revenue was from the 2019 bond proceeds, police impact fees, and police impact fees. The total cost of the project is $11,590,311, which was higher than anticipated due to inflation and the price of the land. He noted the fire station will be constructed to the minimum footprint for fire but would include a shooting range on the west side of the station. There were a couple of options that would bring the cost down a bit. Those were to not fully finish the shooting range for a savings of $692,784 or to not building the shoot range for a savings of $1,038,120. Mr. Bunker did not feel the prices would get an cheaper than they are today, so if they did not construct or complete the shooting range they would have to bring in a contractor in the future. Mr. Bunker recommended to amend the CMGC with SIRQ construction in the amount of $9,112,335 and allow staff to work on Value Engineering items that would reduce costs. Mayor Frost expressed appreciation for the summary and agreed, especially the shooting range. He felt it was important to have that asset and control in the city. Mayor Frost asked the council if they had any questions. Council Member Carroll commented on Value Engineering. She expressed that she fully supports Value Engineering and wanted to make the fire station has high quality construction, looks nice, and will last a long time. She wasn’t sure if Value Engineering reduces that quality, but it was her concern. Council Member Taylor commented the city was conscious of the cost, however, there have been times where in the end it costs more money down the road. He added that with public safety being a number one priority, as elected officials, he agreed with Council Member Carroll that the city have state of the art things that makes sense. In terms of all things that will serve the public, that the city works to provide that which we expect of our public safety and hoped that the budget is right where it needs to be. Council Member Shelton asked about the contract with Cedar Hills and what the city would increase annually by having our station built. Mr. Bunker estimated that it was close to $300,000 but that there would be an additional fee when the city vacates the Cedar Hills building. Council Member Shelton hopes that it will help offset some of the fees. He mentioned in the contract section 6.1.5, where it talks about rental rates for construction management, it says N/A in there and wanted to double check that it was supposed to be there. Mr. Bunker replied that it was not applicable. Council Member Barnes commented he thought the firing range was going to be in the basement of the fire department and wanted to know why that was no longer an option. Mr. Bunker responded that one of the reasons was cost. It is more expensive to be done in the basement than build it out on the side. Another concern was safety if there was a stray bullet it could harm someone above. Council Member Barnes inquired about the Impact Fees and how much was in it. Mr. Bunker responded that it was about $2.5 million in each one. Council Member Barnes asked why the city shouldn’t do the police station also if we have the money. Mr. Bunker replied that staff recommends completing the fire station project first. Council Member Hunter mentioned that discussions about the fire station happened prior before he was on the council, and he is working for the contractor and wanted to abstain from voting. Council Member Shelton moved to approve the AMENDED CMGC Contract with SIRQ Construction for Fire Station 52 with a guaranteed maximum price of $9,112,335 (or other GMP if shooting range is modified or eliminated) and instruct staff to coordinate the consideration of value engineering items which will reduce the GMP accordingly. Council Member Taylor seconded the motion. Voting was as follows: RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Rob Shelton, Council Member SECONDER: Clark Taylor, Council Member AYES: Shelton, Carroll, Barnes, Taylor ABSTAIN: Ryan Hunter View minutes, page 1 · View minutes, page 2 · View minutes, page 3

• July 26, 2022 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — July 26, 2022
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Potential space for a police facility

      • Background: During an annexation and zoning discussion concerning property near 1700 North and North County Boulevard, Council Member Ryan Hunter raised the possibility that the city might need the public-facilities-zoned property for additional Police Department space. Relevant discussion from the official meeting minutes: Council Member Hunter responded that it may be beneficial to the city to have a public facility there, and that they needed to consider whether they needed additional space for the police department. He added that he’s not sure if he’s ready for a change in the master plan as there has been a lot of thought and time that’s gone into the general plan that says that it is zoned as a PF zone. View minutes, page 3

• June 7, 2022 — Work Session

  • American Fork City Council — Work Session Minutes — June 7, 2022
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Three police officers, records staffing, and tax funding

      • Background: The proposed budget tied additional police and records staffing to increased public-safety costs and a proposed property-tax increase. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: Ms. Montoya gave an overview of the personnel changes by function. The proposal included reorganizing in Administration and Community services and adding a full-time Community Service Director which is currently vacant. They were proposing a full-time Arborist (split 75% from the General Fund and 25% in Irrigation). Also, additional staff for Library, Parks, and Senior Center. Some of that is offset by additional revenue. In Public Safety, they were proposing 4.5 additional FTE - 3 full-time police officers, 2 part-time records specialists in Police department, and move a part-time Deputy Fire Marshall to full-time. The 2 part-time records will equal one full-time FTE. Public Works is proposing 1.25 for a full-time Public Works technician in the Streets department and moving a part-time administrative assistant to full-time. In Development Services, they were adding one full-time planner and moving a part-time to full-time for administrative assistant due to the workload and development. In Utilities 1.25 was mostly in storm drain. It has one full-time coordinator and one full-time inspector. They were also proposing a full-time Public Works technician in Water that will be split between Culinary and Irrigation. The total is 14.8 of FTE which is a 5% increase overall. Ms. Montoya discussed property tax, per previous work session, looking at a $10 per month per household which equates to $120 a year. She showed the proposed public notice. She mentioned the certified tax rate should be received next week. She guessed the proposed rate will be less than pegging the rate due to inflation and the rise of evaluations but won’t now know for certain until we receive the certified tax rate. The increase from property tax will go to fund the increased public safety costs and road improvements. View minutes, page 1 · View minutes, page 2

• February 10–11, 2022 — Budget Workshop

  • American Fork City Council — Budget Workshop Minutes — February 10–11, 2022
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Police/courts building capacity and lease options

      • Background: The city identified the Police Department’s lack of space as a critical facility decision and considered how the courts’ lease, rental revenue, and possible justice-court costs affected available police space. Relevant passage from the official meeting minutes: There are four projects with critical timelines: • Police/Courts. Unfortunately, they have more officers packed into the police department than they ever thought they would, and they have completely outgrown the building. Currently, the courts have the second and third floor of the building and the contract will expire the end of September. However, there is an option for a 5-year extension that if they choose to. The city will need to re-evaluate the price per square foot and get back with the courts. If the courts were to move, they would lose the rent revenue, but the rent revenue does not cover the bond payments for a new building. It was beneficial to the police department to have the courts in American Fork, but the legal department has been looking into the possibility of having our own Justice Court. Ms. Egner explained she was unable to find any city that came out ahead with a justice court when they factor in the prosecutors. View minutes, page 5

    • Cedar Hills contract costs, public-safety retention, and tax options

      • Background: The workshop connected the economics of contracted police services, public-safety employee retention, and proposed property-tax increases. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: There was a discussion on the Cedar Hills contract and the annual increase of 2%. It was noted that does not cover the increases, but they do pay additional funds when go over the agreed upon number of calls. Ms. Montoya went over the general fund expenditures by department. Public safety has increased while every other department has gone down. Ms. Montoya asked why they would increase the property tax rate. There were several reasons, but the biggest reasons were public safety employee retention; the amount increased for public safety to stay competitive was $730,000. The city was short for what was needed for road improvement; they have allocated $2.5 million a year but the needs were significantly higher. She wanted to show the tax rate scenario with the outcomes of a pegged rate, .01 increase, .025 increase, and .05 increase based on an assessed value increase of 5%. She explained if they pegged the tax rate, the increase would be approximately $22 per year per home with a total revenue increase of $221,094. For each .01 increase, the revenue brough in would be approximately $320,650. The council discussed the options presented regarding the property tax. The city needed to look at our needs, regardless of what the school district does. Council Member Shelton felt the .25% rate increase and pegging thereafter was the best option. Council Member Taylor thought the .25% increase was already eaten up with the needs and felt they may need to choose the .5% option with pegging thereafter. It was noted the citizen survey was encouraging with the comments that they would be okay with an increase if it went towards roads. Ms. Montoya stated they can update the schedule when they get more tax rate information in June. With truth in taxation, they would have to hold a public hearing where people may show up to make public comment; if the city were to double the rate, a lot of people will comment. It was felt the city can justify the increase. When the rate is pegged, the higher the valuation then the property taxes would be higher; if they have a double digit increase in fair market value, they will have a much larger increase. If the council opts to peg the tax rate, they will have to go through truth in taxation every year and could make a decision at that time. Ms. Montoya went over the truth in taxation milestones. If they decide to do this, the city will need to put in the tentative budget the increased property tax. As part of the budget process, they will have meetings with time for the public to provide input. There was the discussion on pegging the tax rate and bringing it up every year or whether to have a huge bump one year and not look at it for a few years. Staff would prepare an analysis on pegging the tax rates. The council also stressed the need to get information out to the public, specifically showing what the funds will be spent on. View minutes, page 7 · View minutes, page 8

• 2021

• February 11–12, 2021 — Budget Workshop

  • American Fork City Council — Budget Workshop Minutes — February 11–12, 2021
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Police staffing, records workload, facilities, and mental-health support

      • Background: Chief Darren Falslev described how call complexity, staffing, detective capacity, evidence storage, records requests, officer mental health, and prevention technology affected the department’s ability to provide service as the city grew. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: Police Chief Falslev started off by noting the Police Department was better now than they were several years ago, but they do need more employees. They were driven by the commercial district and high-density housing. In the past, they could take calls with one officer but now they need two or three officers due to the combative nature of people. They are receiving more calls but now must dedicate more officers per call. In 20 years, they will need 110 officers. They pride themselves on a higher level of service; their cases are prepared, and they do it right the first time. In addition to more personnel, they needed office space and evidence storage space. American Fork had the lowest ratio of detectives to population in the county. Their officers tell him they stay here because they like it. Chief Falslev commented that mental health was becoming an issue and he felt a mental health advocate would be mandated in the next few years. He pointed out his department had over 100 GRAMA requests a week and that Adam Ellison spent most of the week on one request. He reported that Russ Anderson, the code enforcement officer, has written more reports up than any other person. Chief Falslev stated the city was obligated to provide 74 parking spaces for the courts according to the contract; they were relying on the parking lot by the Apollo to help provide that and they were also using parking spaces at the Fire Station. Council Member Shelton brought up electronic finger printing. Chief Falslev stated a citizen donated funds to pay for the electronics for the system. Chief Falslev stated they were not asking for toys but for the bare minimum. Council Member Carroll commented she liked the idea of a mental health advocate; that one person could help take off pressure from our other officers. She also noted that last year there was a planned philosophy for community policing through planning design. Chief Falslev commented that by designing proper lighting, fencing, landscaping you could help prevent some concerns. There was a discussion on cameras in strategic places within the city; the placement of cameras was a huge deterrent. Chief Falslev finished up by noting that the connection you can make with young kids can affect them for the rest of their lives. View minutes, page 6

• 2020

• August 25, 2020 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — August 25, 2020
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Dispatch Board funding for a technology package

      • Background: Council Member Robert Shelton reported a Dispatch Board decision to fund a technology package for the dispatch agency. Relevant passage from the official meeting minutes: Council Member Rob Shelton stated that the Dispatch Board held a meeting and they voted to pick up the cost of the technology package that they had decided to install. It was about $30,000 and the agency was going to pick up that cost. View minutes, page 2

• June 16, 2020 — Special Session

  • American Fork City Council — Special Session Minutes — June 16, 2020
  • Public Comments

    • Jessica Dalton: Mayor Frost, I am a born and raised citizen of American Fork as is my husband. We both love this city so much that we knew it was the place we wanted to raise our children and so when it came time to buy, we were thrilled to find a place in what we have always considered our home town. I have always had a good experience with our police force, but my experience is as a white member of our city with privilege. I believe that we can always do more to make American Fork better, especially as our city grows and the demographic of our city changes. While I was pleased to read the response from Chief Darren Falslev, it felt more like a “these are all the great things we are doing” rather than a letter explaining the things they are doing but how they will improve upon them. First the mention of “all lives matter”, while I believe the sentiment to be sincere by Chief Falslev, this is a phrase that is used to dismiss and silence the struggles and prejudices that our black brothers and sisters as well as other marginalized groups go through. I want to see this phrase, as well as other phrases that are used to dismiss and undermine the excess force against black people, removed from public documents. Some other phrases include “color blind” and “blue lives matter”. I am glad to see that all officers receive CIT training, however, it’s concerning that not all of them receive the training from the Arbinger Institute Outward Mindset curriculum. Why is it that we are not training all of our officers with this curriculum especially when it is states that the department values each individual? I would like to see this as an improvement by our police force to have each officer receive this training. Another thing that can be vastly improved upon is to have the body cams worn always, not just regularly. This not only protects our police force but our community and residents as well. And along with that, when investigations are needed, we need to have them done by an independent civilian review board and not by an internal investigation board. This board would be democratically elected, not appointed by local Mayors or Governors as well as it must not include current police officers or relatives of police officers. By voting for the members of these boards, it with accountability and transparency which we need to protect the people. I believe that the by doing these things, we can make American Fork better and a more welcome place as it continues to grow. I want to continue to say that American Fork is a great place to live as we move into the future. Jessica Dalton View minutes, page 1View minutes, page 2

    • Claudia Rasmussen: Hello city council, Here is what I expect from the American Fork Police Department. No use of phrases in public documents that have been used to undermine the excess use of force by police against black people. Some of these are All Lives Matter, Color Blind, and Thin Blue Lines Matter. Every officer not just those with the "Advanced Officer status" should be trained in the Arbinger Institute Outward Mindset that emphasizes the intrinsic value of every individual. Our police department needs to be investigated by democratically elected, independent civilian review boards; which have the power to investigate police, and also bring charges against police. These boards must have subpoena power. These boards must not include current police officers or relatives of police officers. The people on these boards must not be appointed by local Mayors, or Governors. We want the ability to vote for the members of these boards and have them give us the accountability and transparency which is needed to protect the people. Body-worn cameras need to be worn not on a regular basis but AT ALL TIMES. We need these changes now! View minutes, page 2View minutes, page 3

    • Lex Scott: A democracy allows for live comments. I suggest that in the future you allow the public comment. It is imperative that your staff attend implicit bias training. It is important that we know how you plan to address and deal with racism in policing. It is imperative that we know your stance on police reform. This should happen soon so that we know who to re-elect and who to canvass against. Thank you View minutes, page 3

• June 9, 2020 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — June 9, 2020
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Public-safety retirement contributions

      • Background: The council discussed the city’s retirement contribution for public-safety employees and the budget effect of employees moving between retirement tiers. Relevant discussion from the official meeting minutes: Mr. Bunker said that the City’s Public Safety employees were grateful to the Council for the contributions. The City contributes more than is legally required. He clarified that the remaining .27% would be required by the employee, but American Fork continues to be generous to their Public Safety employees. Council Member Barnes commented on the budget impact of $7,000 annually as outlined in the packet. He noted that as they move forward, and more people transition from being tier one to tier two he that the budget impact would continue to rise. Mr. Bunker said that Council Member Barnes was correct. However, as more people became tier two, less people were on tier one which was a higher contribution and cost the City more. Because of this, the transition to tier two was actually beneficial to the City. View minutes, page 8

• 2019

• January 22, 2019 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — January 22, 2019
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Dispatch technology intended to reduce response times

      • Background: During his council report, Council Member Robert Shelton described dispatch technology that he said could reduce emergency-response times and asked the council to consider implementing it. Relevant passage from the official meeting minutes: Council Member Shelton reported that he was able to preview new technology. This technology was revolutionizing dispatch services by reducing response times. He asked that the Council consider implementing it in the City. View minutes, page 2

    • Lease financing for six police vehicles

      • Background: During consideration of financing six police vehicles, Kyle Maurer explained how the proposed master lease would operate. Relevant discussion from the official meeting minutes: When asked by Council Member Shelton what a master lease was, Mr. Maurer explained it was a leasing agreement that would set the terms for the out-clauses. It was structured like an auto loan. View minutes, page 6

    • Cedar Hills police-services contract

      • Background: The broader agenda item covered public-safety contracts with Cedar Hills. This excerpt retains the portion specifically explaining the police-services agreement. Relevant discussion from the official meeting minutes: Council Member Carroll asked how the police service was structured. Mr. Bunker responded it was a two-year contract with a 3% increase at the end of the two years. It also had the 180-day clause. View minutes, page 3 · View minutes, page 4

• 2018

• February 8–9, 2018 — Budget Workshop

  • American Fork City Council — Budget Workshop Minutes — February 8–9, 2018
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • Police staffing, evidence storage, dispatch, radios, and fleet planning

      • Background: The workshop documented an evidence-storage shortage, unreliable dispatch communications, staffing needs, and multiyear radio and vehicle planning. These matters bear on the department’s capacity to preserve evidence, answer calls, and equip personnel. Relevant passages from the official meeting minutes: Council Member Shelton noted the Police Department was also requesting a storage shed and asked if this would be in addition to what they have. Police Chief Falslev answered the current shed was already full. Chief Falslev explained that the current shed was housing a truck that had to be kept for an unknown amount of time as it was part of a murder case. Council Member Shelton had a fourth big idea to add, which was the tower capacity with Dispatch. They needed to keep pressure on Dispatch to correct the problem of dispatching out emergency personnel and the communication not getting to the personnel. Police • Additional Personnel – there was a lot of growth that would be coming, but they do not have the personnel to handle the additional load. They need one additional records information specialist, a code enforcement officer, and traffic enforcement officer. They needed to dig out of the hole they have been in for years. • Radio Switchover – they were able to upgrade radios to the first standard, so they were compliant for ten years to give them time to switch over to the second standard. They need to transition radios for a cost of $212,810 over five years. • Vehicle Rotation Plan – they started a five-year rotation plan to replace vehicles; they need to capitalize on the investments to reduce repair and replacement costs. They would replace the radio when they replace the car. View minutes, page 5 · View minutes, page 9

• January 23, 2018 — Regular Session

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — January 23, 2018
  • Police Oversight and Governance

    • COPS grant for a school resource officer

      • Background: The council discussed a federal grant for a new school resource officer at American Fork Junior High, the grant’s cost structure, and its longer-term implications. Relevant discussion from the official meeting minutes: Police Chief Falslev said this was an important grant for American Fork. It was a highly competitive grant and only 16% of the agencies who applied were successful on obtaining funds. This was also important because they built relationships with the community with implementing community policing. This grant would benefit the Jr. High because that was where they would assign the additional officer. The grant would pay $125,000 over three years in wages and benefits. In negotiating with the school district, there would be no cost to the City for three years. Council Member Shelton asked if the agreement with the school district continued as long as there was an SRO assigned. The Chief said they intended for this agreement to continue in the future. Council Member Carroll said she was impressed they were able to get the grant. She asked if they would be hiring a new officer and what would happen the fourth year. Chief Falslev said the fourth year would carry over because they were implementing the money in January instead of the beginning of the new fiscal year. They were either required to re-hire someone who was laid off or hire someone new. In this case they would hire someone new. Council Member Barnes asked if they could apply for the grant every three years. Chief Falslev said the grant was offered every year; they would apply every year but the process was highly competitive. Council Member Barnes said he was grateful for the police department and remarked that this was a benefit to the community. Council Member Taylor said he did not think this happened by accident. He commended Chief Falslev for all that he had accomplished during his tenure as Police Chief. View minutes, page 6 · View minutes, page 7

    • Police overtime for Steel Days

      • Background: Council Member Kevin Barnes requested clarification of police-overtime funding in the Steel Days management agreement. Relevant discussion from the official meeting minutes: Council Member Barnes asked if they could clarify the $12,000 overtime for the police department in Section 3.4. He also noted that in Section 4.3 there was a typo that needed to be fixed. View minutes, page 9

    • State of the City public-safety remarks

      • Background: Mayor Bradley Frost discussed police workload, domestic-violence response, overdose response, emergency coordination, and police leadership as part of a broader public-safety address. Relevant discussion from the official meeting minutes: Our Police and Fire do much for us. Last year our Police had almost 30,000 service calls, made 233 felony arrests, and averaged 1,252 open investigations. Similarly, our Fire & Rescue handled 2,895 calls for service, which is just under Lehi, who is double our population. These brave men and women have taken an oath to protect and serve. That is there job. But their love of that job and the community has driven them to do much more that what is required. Last year our Police decided to do something about the growing number of domestic violence cases. They assigned one investigator full time to domestic violence cases and began offering public education programs to the community. In fact, I personally worked closely with our Police and Utah County to put together a regional town hall meeting to educate people on the issue and connect those in need to available resources. Our police are often the first call on incidents, but they remain involved, often meeting with many other agencies along the way, to ensure the best outcome of each domestic violence case. In an effort to be proactive our Police and Fire departments started a program where they have equipped and trained our Police officers who are typically first on scene to use Narcan, a drug that can save the lives of those succumbing to a drug overdose. In another example of doing more, our Fire department has begun to train with our Police department so they can provide lifesaving services to injured people DURING an active shooter situation rather than waiting until AFTER it’s safe to go in and triage. Out residents enjoy lower insurance costs thanks in part to the responsiveness to our Fire department. Our Police Chief has taken an active role in legislature that impacts public safety and now sits on a policy making board at the capital. Finally, our Fire department working towards certifying all City employees to be CPR ready. This will dramatically increase our ability to respond in an emergency. The point is, these actions show how our community is in good hands with a Police and Fire department who actively, rather than reactively, serve and protect all of us. View minutes, page 13 · View minutes, page 14

• Additional Meeting Minutes Reviewed

• These official minutes were reviewed, but no qualifying public comment or Police Oversight and Governance discussion is currently presented from them.

• 2025

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — March 25, 2025
• 2024

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — August 27, 2024
  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — April 30, 2024
• 2021

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — November 9, 2021
  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — September 28, 2021
  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — January 12, 2021
• 2019

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — May 14, 2019
• 2018

  • American Fork City Council — Regular Session Minutes — December 11, 2018